本体论中立性定理：为什么中立的本体论基础必须是前因果和前规范的

This research investigates the critical constraints on ontological design in modern data systems. The study demonstrates that any ontology intended to serve as a shared foundation must maintain accountability across persistent legal, political, and analytic disagreements. The paper presents an impossibility result for ontological neutrality: neutrality, understood as interpretive non-commitment and stability under incompatible extensions, is incompatible with the inclusion of causal or normative commitments at the foundational layer. This means that any system that asserts causal or deontic conclusions as ontological facts cannot function as a neutral substrate across divergent interpretive frameworks without requiring revision or leading to contradiction. Consequently, neutral ontological substrates must be pre-causal and pre-normative, representing only entities and their identity and persistence conditions while externalizing interpretation, evaluation, and explanation. This research establishes the necessary design constraints for systems intended to maintain a shared, stable representation of reality across conflicting interpretive frameworks.