📄 中文摘要
美国最高法院近日决定不审理一起关于AI生成艺术作品是否可以获得版权的案件。此案由密苏里州的计算机科学家斯蒂芬·萨勒提起，他对法院维持的裁决表示不满，该裁决认为AI生成的艺术作品无法获得版权。2019年，美国版权局已明确表示，只有人类创作的作品才能申请版权，这一决定引发了广泛的讨论和争议。最高法院的拒绝审理意味着这一法律立场将继续保持，AI生成艺术作品的版权问题仍未得到解决。
美国最高法院拒绝审理AI生成艺术作品的版权问题
📄 English Summary
AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted after Supreme Court declines to review the rule
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case regarding whether AI-generated art can obtain copyright. This decision follows an appeal by Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist from Missouri, against a court ruling that upheld the finding that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted. In 2019, the US Copyright Office clarified that only works created by humans are eligible for copyright protection, a stance that has sparked significant debate. The Supreme Court's refusal to review the case means that the legal position on copyright for AI-generated art remains unchanged, leaving the issue unresolved.