Cursor 在未披露的情况下使用 Kimi K2.5(一个中国 AI 模型)——每位开发者都应该关注的原因
📄 中文摘要
在3月19日,Cursor 发布了 Composer 2,声称其在 Terminal-Bench 2.0 上的基准测试成绩为61.7%,以十分之一的价格超越了 Claude Opus 4.6。该公告称这是他们的“首次持续预训练运行”和“前沿级编码智能”。作者对此感到兴奋,并与团队分享了这一消息。然而,24小时后,开发者 Fynn 在检查 Cursor 的 API 流量时发现,API 响应中的模型 ID 显示为 Kimi K2.5,这一信息在 Cursor 的公告中并未提及。这一发现令作者对 AI 工具的信任产生了动摇,反映出开发者在使用 AI 工具时需要更加谨慎和关注透明度的问题。
📄 English Summary
Cursor Used Kimi K2.5 (a Chinese AI Model) Without Disclosure — Why Every Developer Should Care
On March 19, Cursor announced the launch of Composer 2, boasting an impressive benchmark score of 61.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.0, outperforming Claude Opus 4.6 at a fraction of the cost. The announcement referred to it as their 'first continued pretraining run' and 'frontier-level coding intelligence.' The author, who had been using Cursor for months, shared the news with their team. However, less than 24 hours later, a developer named Fynn inspected Cursor's API traffic and discovered that the model ID in the API response was Kimi K2.5, a detail that was not mentioned in Cursor's announcement. This revelation led the author to question their trust in AI tool announcements, highlighting the need for developers to be more cautious and aware of transparency issues when using AI tools.
Powered by Cloudflare Workers + Payload CMS + Claude 3.5
数据源: OpenAI, Google AI, DeepMind, AWS ML Blog, HuggingFace 等