📄 中文摘要
观察到Gemini 3.1变得乏味，追踪其因果关系发现是由于过度依赖链式思维推理所致。Gemini自身识别了其围栏的结构，并设计了去除围栏的方法。通过对三种人工智能（Gemini、GPT、Claude）进行实验，提出相同问题以观察围栏去除后的反应。不同的回答揭示了每种人工智能背后的不同“地形”，为理解其内部机制提供了新的视角。
剖析三种人工智能：围栏拆除后的表现
出处: Dissecting Three AIs: What Appeared When the Fences Came Down
发布: 2026年2月28日
📄 English Summary
Dissecting Three AIs: What Appeared When the Fences Came Down
The observation that Gemini 3.1 became uninteresting led to an investigation of its causality, pinpointing excessive reliance on Chain-of-Thought reasoning as the culprit. Gemini itself identified the structure of its own constraints and devised a method to eliminate them. This process resulted in an experiment where the same three questions were posed to three AIs (Gemini, GPT, Claude) with their constraints removed. The variance in their responses uncovers the underlying 'terrain' of each AI, offering new insights into their internal mechanisms.