📄 中文摘要
Grammarly最近关闭了其AI‘专家评审’功能，该功能在提供编辑建议时，错误地将建议归因于知名作者和学者，而未获得他们的同意。这一做法引发了用户的不满，并导致了针对Grammarly的集体诉讼。诉讼指控该公司侵犯了作者的知识产权和隐私权，认为其行为误导了用户，并可能造成对被引用作者声誉的损害。Grammarly的这一决定反映了在AI技术应用中，如何平衡创新与伦理问题的重要性。
Grammarly因其AI‘专家评审’功能面临集体诉讼
📄 English Summary
Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature
Grammarly recently shut down its AI 'Expert Review' feature, which presented editing suggestions as if they were from established authors and academics without their consent. This practice led to user dissatisfaction and resulted in a class action lawsuit against Grammarly. The lawsuit accuses the company of infringing on the intellectual property and privacy rights of the authors, claiming that its actions misled users and could harm the reputations of the cited authors. This decision by Grammarly highlights the importance of balancing innovation and ethical considerations in the application of AI technology.