📄 中文摘要
Grammarly 最近推出了一项新功能，声称能够通过世界顶尖作家和思想家的帮助来提升用户的写作水平，同时也包括一些科技记者的意见。然而，这项功能的实际效果引发了质疑，因为它并未真正依赖于这些专家的直接参与。用户在使用该功能时，可能会发现提供的反馈并不如预期，缺乏深度和专业性。尽管Grammarly的目标是借助知名人士的智慧来改善写作，但现实中却显得有些失落，未能达到用户的期望。
Grammarly 的‘专家审查’缺乏真正的专家
出处: Grammarly’s ‘expert review’ is just missing the actual experts
发布: 2026年3月7日
📄 English Summary
Grammarly’s ‘expert review’ is just missing the actual experts
Grammarly has recently introduced a new feature that claims to enhance users' writing with insights from some of the world's great writers and thinkers, as well as contributions from tech journalists. However, the effectiveness of this feature has come under scrutiny, as it does not genuinely involve these experts in a meaningful way. Users may find that the feedback provided lacks depth and professionalism, falling short of their expectations. While Grammarly aims to leverage the wisdom of renowned figures to improve writing, the reality appears somewhat disappointing, failing to meet user demands.