📄 中文摘要
随着 AI 工具在写作、编程和思维中的深入应用，大学面临一个复杂的问题：如何监管一种设计上隐形的工具。慕尼黑大学统计学研究所最近发布的学术工作中 AI 工具使用指南，提出了一种务实的平衡方式。该指南并未禁止 AI 或假装其不存在，而是将其视为一种工具，强调与其他工具和来源一样需要透明度。其核心理念基于责任和透明性，强调在学术工作中应对 AI 的使用进行适当的记录和说明，以确保学术诚信和透明度。
学生在学术工作中如何记录 AI 使用情况？
出处: How Should Students Document AI Usage in Academic Work?
发布: 2026年3月26日
📄 English Summary
How Should Students Document AI Usage in Academic Work?
As AI tools become increasingly integrated into writing, coding, and thinking, universities face a challenging question: how to regulate something that is inherently invisible. The Institute of Statistics at LMU Munich has recently published guidelines for the use of AI tools in academic work that strike a pragmatic balance. Instead of banning AI or pretending it doesn't exist, these guidelines treat AI as a tool that requires the same level of transparency expected from other tools and sources. The core philosophy rests on two pillars: responsibility and transparency, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and disclosure of AI usage in academic work to ensure academic integrity.