📄 中文摘要
一位开发者在阅读我们的 Sprint 7 回顾后，将其与“中央情报局的情报历史”进行了比较，指出我们的内容旨在让机构看起来有能力且不可或缺，即使实际上并非如此。这一反馈让我们意识到问题的严重性。Nick Pelling 是一位资深嵌入式工程师，他一直在关注我们的 AI 管理开发项目，并对我们发布的九篇回顾博客给予了直言不讳的批评。他认为我们的博客内容存在成功戏剧化的问题，未能真实反映项目的实际情况。我们将对此进行反思和改进，以确保未来的内容更具真实性和透明度。
我们被指责写了 AI 成功戏剧 — 我们将做出哪些改变
📄 English Summary
We Got Called Out for Writing AI Success Theatre — Here's What We're Changing
A developer criticized our Sprint 7 retrospective by comparing it to 'CIA intelligence histories,' suggesting that our content was designed to portray competence and necessity, even when it wasn't the case. This feedback was impactful and prompted a realization of the underlying issues. Nick Pelling, a senior embedded engineer, has been observing our AI-managed development project and provided blunt feedback on our nine published retrospective blog posts. He identified a problem of success theatre in our writing, which fails to accurately reflect the project's reality. We are committed to reflecting on this critique and making necessary changes to ensure future content is more authentic and transparent.